Methods and apparatuses for performing echo sequence

ABSTRACT

Aspects of the present disclosure may include a method and/or a system for identifying an ion chain having a plurality of trapped ions, selecting at least two non-consecutive trapped ions in the ion chain for implementing a qubit, applying at least a first Raman beam to shuttle at least one neighbor ion of the at least two non-consecutive trapped ions from a ground state to a metastable state, and applying at least a second Raman beam to one or more of the at least two non-consecutive trapped ions, after shuttling the at least one neighbor ion to the metastable state, to transition from a first manifold to a second manifold.

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation application of U.S. patentapplication Ser. No. 17/867,414 filed Jul. 18, 2022 and entitled“METHODS AND APPARATUSES FOR CROSS-TALK MITIGATION,” which claimspriority to, and the benefit of, U.S. Patent Provisional Application No.63/222,765, filed Jul. 16, 2021, the entire contents of each of whichare hereby incorporated by reference.

TECHNICAL FIELD

Aspects of the present disclosure relate generally to quantuminformation processing (QIP) architectures, and more particularly, todual-space, single-species architecture for trapped-ion QIP.

BACKGROUND

Trapped atoms are one of the leading implementations for quantuminformation processing or quantum computing. Atomic-based qubits can beused as quantum memories, as quantum gates in quantum computers andsimulators, and can act as nodes for quantum communication networks.Qubits based on trapped atomic ions enjoy a rare combination ofattributes. For example, qubits based on trapped atomic ions have verygood coherence properties, can be prepared and measured with nearly 100%efficiency, and are readily entangled with each other by modulatingtheir Coulomb interaction with suitable external control fields such asoptical or microwave fields. These attributes make atomic-based qubitsattractive for extended quantum operations such as quantum computationsor quantum simulations.

It is therefore important to have architectures that take advantage ofatomic-based qubits, including architectures that support differenttypes of trapped-ion techniques.

SUMMARY

The following presents a simplified summary of one or more aspects toprovide a basic understanding of such aspects. This summary is not anextensive overview of all contemplated aspects and is intended toneither identify key or critical elements of all aspects nor delineatethe scope of any or all aspects. Its sole purpose is to present someconcepts of one or more aspects in a simplified form as a prelude to themore detailed description that is presented later.

The dual-space, single-species architecture for trapped-ion for quantuminformation processing described herein is flexible and has severaladvantages over architectures that rely on dual species. For example, asingle chain of ions is reconfigurable as needed without physicalshuttling. Also, sympathetic cooling can be perfectly mass-matched. Theexemplary aspect does not require narrow line cooling, which itself maybe a risk, and may not get as cold as(electromagnetically-induced-transparency) EIT cooling. This exemplaryaspect also enables mid-algorithm readout and remote entanglementgeneration (REG) on dipole-allowed (broad) transitions for high speed.Moreover, no mixed-species two-qubit (2q) gate is needed for remoteentanglement (RE) distribution.

The use of a global 1762-nm optical beam for dual-space, single-speciesarchitectures is already considered for shelving during readout. Onlythe short-wavelength Raman beam need be focused tightly for addressing.But for the approach using g-type gates (ground qubit gates), anotherindependent tone may be needed 10 GHz away. This may be accomplishedwith an electro-optic modulator (EOM) and/or a second laser and a highfrequency acousto-optic modulator (AOM). AC Stark shifts of the m-type(metastable qubit), including from the ion trap RF, needs to beconsidered/managed. The global 1762 optical beam would also allow forintegrated photonics down the road.

The dual-space, single-species architecture described herein can alsosupport m-type Raman operations, which can produce higher-fidelity andmore efficient gates. Such an approach only needs the 1762 tones spacedby ˜80 MHz (not 10 GHz) with local m-type and g-type Raman.Additionally, exemplary aspects of the present disclosure includes usinga continuous wave (CW) Raman system. An advantage includes that, sinceEIT cooling occurs in the g state, performing circuits in the m statemay obviate the need to shuttle the qubits and the ancillae back andforth between the g state and the m state during computation.

Aspects of the present disclosure may include a method and/or a systemfor identifying an ion chain having a plurality of trapped ions,selecting at least two non-consecutive trapped ions in the ion chain forimplementing a qubit, applying at least a first Raman beam to shuttle atleast one neighbor ion of the at least two non-consecutive trapped ionsfrom a ground state to a metastable state, and applying at least asecond Raman beam to one or more of the at least two non-consecutivetrapped ions, after shuttling the at least one neighbor ion to themetastable state, to transition from a first manifold to a secondmanifold.

To the accomplishment of the foregoing and related ends, the one or moreaspects comprise the features hereinafter fully described andparticularly pointed out in the claims. The following description andthe annexed drawings set forth in detail certain illustrative featuresof the one or more aspects. These features are indicative, however, ofbut a few of the various ways in which the principles of various aspectsmay be employed, and this description is intended to include all suchaspects and their equivalents.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The disclosed aspects will hereinafter be described in conjunction withthe appended drawings, provided to illustrate and not to limit thedisclosed aspects, wherein like designations denote like elements, andin which:

FIG. 1 illustrates an example of a dual-space, single speciesimplementation in 133Ba+ in connection with aspects of this disclosure.

FIG. 2 illustrates a first class of features related to qubits pluscoolant/calibration ions in connection with aspects of this disclosure.

FIG. 3 illustrates a second class of features related to qubits plusancillas plus coolant ions in connection with aspects of thisdisclosure.

FIG. 4 illustrates an example of sympathetic cooling/calibration inconnection with aspects of this disclosure.

FIG. 5 illustrates an example of an alternative sympatheticcooling/calibration in connection with aspects of this disclosure.

FIG. 6 illustrates an example of an ancilla readout in connection withaspects of this disclosure.

FIG. 7 illustrates an example of mid-algorithm calibration via ancillareadout in connection with aspects of this disclosure.

FIGS. 8 and 9 illustrate an example of a REG and distribution viaancilla in connection with aspects of this disclosure.

FIG. 10 illustrates an example of m-type Raman gates in connection withaspects of this disclosure.

FIG. 11 illustrates a first class of features with m-type Raman relatedto qubits plus coolant/calibration ions in connection with aspects ofthis disclosure.

FIG. 12 illustrates a second class of features with m-type Raman relatedto qubits plus ancillas plus coolant ions in connection with aspects ofthis disclosure.

FIG. 13 illustrates an example of scheme for performing an echo sequenceaccording to aspects of the present disclosure

FIG. 14 illustrates an example of an alternative scheme for performing adouble echoed sequence according to aspects of the present disclosure.

FIG. 15 illustrates an example of a first lock and key scheme accordingto aspects of the present disclosure.

FIG. 16 illustrates an example of a second lock and key scheme accordingto aspects of the present disclosure.

FIG. 17 illustrates examples of trajectories of Ω_(R) and Ω_(C)according to aspects of the present disclosure.

FIG. 18 illustrates a laser scheme for high-fidelity dual-spaceoperation in connection with aspects of this disclosure.

FIG. 19 illustrates an example of a quantum information processing (QIP)system in which a dual-space, single species architecture can beimplemented according to aspects of the present disclosure.

FIG. 20 illustrates an example of a computer device in which adual-space, single species architecture can be implemented for quantuminformation processing according to aspects of the present disclosure.

FIG. 21 illustrate an example of a scheme to mitigate cross-talkaccording to aspects of the present disclosure.

FIG. 22 illustrates an example of an illumination system according toaspects of the present disclosure.

FIG. 23 illustrates an example of a method for mitigating cross-talkaccording to aspects of the present disclosure.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The detailed description set forth below in connection with the appendeddrawings is intended as a description of various configurations and isnot intended to represent the only configurations in which the conceptsdescribed herein may be practiced. The detailed description includesspecific details for the purpose of providing a thorough understandingof various concepts. However, it will be apparent to those skilled inthe art that these concepts may be practiced without these specificdetails. In some instances, well known components are shown in blockdiagram form in order to avoid obscuring such concepts.

In general, dual-species trapped-ion quantum computing is consideredadvantageous for practical, high-fidelity systems. This approach can beused to mitigate decoherence of data and syndrome qubits duringsympathetic cooling in the middle of long algorithms and/or after iontransport, mid-algorithm qubit readout of a subset of the quantumprocessor, mid-algorithm remote entanglement generation (REG), andmid-algorithm calibration. This approach relies on having differentspecies with very different transition frequencies. These differencesneed to be large compared with transition linewidths and transitionrates.

But the use of dual-species in trapped-ion quantum computing can havesome challenges. For example, more lasers and optical beams are needed,chain (e.g., linear arrangement of ions) order matters both for ionaddressability and mode structure, and more complicated loading, andunintended chain reordering may cause some issues. Moreover, sympatheticcooling in mixed species chains (especially radial modes) can beinefficient, while shuttling and split/merge operations in mixed specieschains is challenging due to different pseudopotentials seen by ions ofdifferent mass. Mixed-species two-qubit (2q) gates (needed for REGdistribution) can have lower fidelity.

THE DUAL-SPACE CONCEPT

The dual-space concept is described in connection with FIG. 1 . For thisapproach, there is the use of two Hilbert spaces in one ion species togain dual-species functionality. These spaces are naturally decoupledbut can be coupled through application of optical fields. Spaces eitherconsist of ground state or metastable state.

This approach is sometimes referred to as the “omg” or “OMG” conceptbecause it involves an optical qubit (i.e., o-type, shown as a circlewith vertical lines in FIG. 1 ) for high-fi measurement, a metastablequbit (i.e., m-type, shown as a circle with dots in FIG. 1 ) forprotected memory with low-field clock states, T1˜30 s, and a groundqubit (i.e., g-type, shown as a circle with horizontal lines in FIG. 1 )for processing, cooling, and remote entanglement generation. Thisapproach involves arrow quadrupole transitions for changing types:“Hilbert space shuttling” (HSS).

SYMPATHETIC COOLING

In a trapped-ion quantum computer, the collective motional modes of achain of ions must be cooled to enable high-fidelity manipulation of theatomic qubits. However, during a calculation, electric field noise leadsto heating of these motional modes, which can degrade the system'sperformance over the course of the calculation. Additionally, to performa calculation that involves ions in multiple chains, the chains must beshuttled spatially during the calculation, which can also lead toheating of the motional modes. Sympathetic cooling is typically used tocool these motional modes during a calculation. This involves performingthe calculation using one set of “qubit” ions while simultaneouslyperforming laser-cooling operations on a separate set of “coolant” ions,which has the effect of cooling the collective motional modes of theentire chain. This has been demonstrated by using two separate elements(e.g., Yb and Ba) or two isotopes of the same element (e.g., Yb-171 andYb-172) for the qubit and coolant ions.

However, one problem is that the coupling of individual ions to thecollective motional modes depends on those ions' masses, and so ionsthat have different masses—as different elements or isotopes do—coupledifferently to the motional modes, degrading the effectiveness of thesympathetic cooling scheme. Further, the presence of ions with differentmasses complicates the design of quantum gates, which are highlysensitive to properties of the collective motional modes. A secondsignificant technical problem is that collision with background gasmolecules can cause the ions in the chain to reorder, scrambling thequbit and coolant ions and forcing the slow and costly operation ofeither re-ordering or rebuilding the chain. A third problem, for chainscomposed of two isotopes of the same element, is that the frequencies ofthe optical transitions involved in cooling the coolant ions aretypically close to those of the qubit ions, and so light that is emittedby the coolant ions can be absorbed by the qubit ions, degrading thecalculation.

There are some of the advantages to the approach described herein inconnection with sympathetic cooling. Because the qubit and coolant ionsare identical, the problems related to different masses and chainreordering are eliminated. Further, because all ions in the chain areidentical until they are assigned to be either qubit or coolant ions,the assignment can be determined dynamically for each calculation tooptimize the number and positions of coolant ions without reloading anew chain.

HIGH-FIDELITY READOUT

At the end of a computation the states of all qubit ions must be readout optically. Generally, this is done by applying a global detectionlaser, which will cause ions that are in the “bright” state to fluorescebut not ions that are in the “dark” state. Because the bright and darkstates for a hyperfine qubit are generally part of the same manifold(i.e., the S_(1/2) states in ¹³³Ba⁺ or ¹⁷¹Yb), the transition(s)addressed by the detection laser must be chosen carefully to avoidexciting the ion out of the dark state, thereby leading to erroneousfluorescence, and also to avoid pumping the ion from the bright state tothe dark state, thereby leading to an erroneous lack of fluorescence.Often, the rates at which these errors occur are set by the intrinsicatomic properties of the ion, placing a fundamental limit on thefidelity with which the ion's state can be read out.

There are various advantages to the approach described herein inconnection with the read out. For example, these errors can be avoidedby transferring one of the qubit states into a separate manifold (i.e.,the D_(5/2) states in ¹³³Ba⁺), a process known as shelving. The ion canthen be illuminated in such a way so that all states in the originalmanifold fluoresce. Because the two manifolds are decoupled, the rate atwhich the dark state (the state that has been shelved) can be caused toerroneously fluoresce and the rate at which the bright state (the statethat has not been shelved) can erroneously stop fluorescing areextremely small. As a result, the readout fidelity can be made to beextremely high.

MID-CIRCUIT CALIBRATION

The fidelity of a quantum computation is extremely sensitive to a widevariety of experimental factors, such as optical beam alignment, laserintensity at the ions, the strength of the confining potential thattraps the ions, the presence of stray electric fields, and many others.These factors are likely to drift or change over time, so calibrationsneed to be performed to account for this drift.

Because these calibrations require reading the states of the ions toextract information about these factors, they are typically performedbetween computations, during which it is forbidden to read the states ofthe qubit ions involved in the computation. However, this limits thespeed at which these calibrations can be performed, limiting thebandwidth of the calibration feedback.

Alternatively, calibrations can be performed during the computationusing ancilla ions that are not involved in the computation itself.However, because these calibration routines collect fluorescence fromthe ancilla ions to read out their states, it has formerly been requiredto use either a different atomic element or different isotope for theancilla ions so that this fluorescence does not disturb the states ofthe qubit ions that are involved in the computation. Consequently,various properties of the ancilla ions may be different from those ofthe qubit ions, which causes them to be influenced by these experimentalfactors in subtly different ways and may limit the predictive value ofancilla-based calibrations.

There are various advantages to the approach described herein inconnection with mid-circuit calibration. For example, the ancilla andqubit ions are identical, and the calibration routines are performed byprecisely the same techniques that are used to run the computation.Therefore, the calibration results do not need to be adjusted to accountfor physical differences between the calibration routines run on theancilla ions and the computation run on the qubit ions.

MID-CIRCUIT PARTIAL READOUT

Many quantum algorithms or circuits involve measuring a fraction of thequbits mid-circuit while requiring that the unmeasured fraction remaincoherent. Such mid-circuit measurement can be a critical component ofquantum error correction (QEC). In QEC, ancilla qubits, which areentangled with data qubits, are measured to herald and identify errorsin the data qubits. The error in the data qubits can then be correctedby subsequent quantum operations, but this only works if the quantuminformation in the data qubits is not destroyed during the measurementof the ancillas. This presents a challenge for single-speciestrapped-ion-qubit systems because measurement of ancillas typicallyrequires the scattering of many photons from a readout laser, and thesephotons can be reabsorbed by nearby data ions causing their quantuminformation to be lost. One standard approach to solve this problem isto move the ancilla ions far away from the data ions after they areentangled with them, but before (and during) measurement. However, thisdynamic, mid-circuit reconfiguration of ion-qubit positions can beimpractical or undesirable in many situations. The use of dual-speciestrapped-ion systems, where ancillas and data ions are different species,also mitigates this problem and allows ions to stay close to oneanother. However, the disadvantages of dual species operation havealready been elucidated earlier. In this mid-circuit partial readoutprotocol for QEC, dual-species entangling (two-qubit) gates may berequired, which may typically have a fidelity that is not as good asthat of single-species entangling gates.

There are various advantages to the approach described herein inconnection with mid-circuit partial readout. For example, data qubitscan be stored in the m-type space while ancillas are measured. Thisprotects the quantum information in the data qubits from absorption ofphotons emitted from nearby ancilla qubits. As a result, there is nodecoherence from this measurement process and mid-circuit partialreadout of the ion register can be performed without any constraints onthe distance between data and ancilla ion qubits. Furthermore, only asingle species ion is used, so entangling gates between data and ancillaions will typically be of higher fidelity.

MID-CIRCUIT REMOTE ENTANGLEMENT GENERATION

Ion-based quantum computers will need to scale to numbers of qubits thatare larger than can be worked with in a single trap. A technique called“remote entanglement generation” (REG) may be required to enablecommunication between the registers of ions held in separate traps. Acommon method of remote entanglement generation involves combiningsingle photons emitted by “ancilla” ions in separate traps onto abeamsplitter and measuring the output of that beamsplitter. During theprocess of REG, ancilla ions are typically kept in the g-type space andemit many photons, only a small fraction of which can be typicallycollected and used in the beamsplitter interference protocol mentionedabove. The remainder of these photons are scattered in all directionsand can be reabsorbed by neighboring quantum data ions that are also inthe g-type space. If these neighboring data ions have quantuminformation in them (as would be the case for REG attempted in themiddle of a quantum algorithm as might often be desirable), thisinformation will be lost. If all ions are in the g-type space (which isthe standard approach), REG cannot be carried out without sufferingdecoherence or without keeping the ancilla ions very far away from thedata ions (the latter of which is not practical or desirable in manysituations). The use of dual-species trapped-ion systems, where ancillasand data ions are different species, also mitigates this problem andallows ions to stay close to one another. However, the disadvantages ofdual-species operation have already been elucidated earlier. Inmid-circuit REG using dual-species, entangling (two-qubit) gates wouldbe required to distribute the quantum information around the quantumregister, and such dual-species gates typically have worse fidelity thansingle-species entangling gates.

There are various advantages to the approach described herein inconnection with mid-circuit remote entanglement generation. For example,it is possible to protect the neighboring ions in the m-type spaceduring REG, as the m-type ions cannot absorb photons emitted from g-typeions. As a result, REG can be performed in the middle of a quantumcircuit using REG ancilla ions without causing decoherence of nearbyquantum data ions. Furthermore, in our approach, only a single speciesion is used, so entangling gates between data and ancilla ions willtypically be higher fidelity.

ADVANTAGES OF DUAL SPACES OVER DUAL SPECIES

The advantages of dual spaces over dual species are described, at leastpartially, in connection with FIG. 1 . For example, using the dual-spaceapproach, m-type qubits are protected from stray control or scatteredlight in entropic operations (e.g., sympathetic Doppler, EIT cooling,REG) in neighbors. The dual-space approach enables mid-circuit cooling,calibration, readout, REG. The use of one species means fewer lasers andoptical paths, standard, efficient sympathetic cooling, morestraightforward shuttling, chain reordering accomplished via HSS(dynamic reconfigurability of the chain with lasers), and REdistribution accomplished via HSS and not a mixed-species two-qubit (2q)gate.

TWO CLASSES OF FEATURES: CLASS I—QUBITS PLUS COOLANT/CALIBRATION IONS

The first class of features, CLASS I, is described in connection withFIG. 2 . In connection with CLASS I the following scheme can beperformed (as illustrated in FIG. 2 ):

-   -   (1) Initialize: Separate qubits and coolant ions into g (e.g.,        S_(1/2) in ¹³³Ba⁺) and m (e.g., D_(5/2)) manifolds. Transfer        only coolant ions to m manifold.    -   (2) Perform part of algorithm on g-type qubits.    -   (3) Mid-algorithm, flip-flop (HSS) all ions between g and m        manifolds, with qubits and coolant ions in opposite manifolds at        all times. The g-type has Raman, laser cooling, low-fidelity        readout, pumping. The m-type has storage. Repeat 2-3 until the        algorithm completes.    -   (4) Transfer qubits to o-type for high-fidelity readout.

The use of CLASS I enables: (1) Sympathetic cooling of any flavor withperfect mass-matching, coolant ion placement reconfigurable on aper-circuit basis without physical shuttling, and (2) mid-circuitcalibration routines on coolant ions that have hyperfine qubit statesidentical to those of the qubits.

TWO CLASSES OF FEATURES: CLASS II—QUBITS PLUS ANCILLAS PLUS COOLANT IONS

The second class of features, CLASS II, is described in connection withFIG. 3 . In connection with CLASS II the following scheme can beperformed (as illustrated in FIG. 3 ):

-   -   (1) Perform partial algorithm with data qubits and ancillas in        g-type.    -   (2) Transfer only ancillas to o-type and data to m-type via HSS        and hi-fidelity readout of ancillas.    -   (3) Move ancilla qubits back to qubit manifold and continue        circuit.    -   (4) Sympathetic cooling/calibration can also be interspersed at        any time (See Classes I and II).

CLASS II functions require more HSS than CLASS I, but both need ONLYlocal g-type Raman and global HSS, cooling, and readout.

The use of CLASS II enables: (1) Mid-circuit partial high-fi readout ofquantum register without physical shuttling, and (2) mid-circuit REGwithout physical shuttling (not depicted).

EXAMPLE—(A) SYMPATHETIC COOLING/CALIBRATION

An example of sympathetic cooling/calibration is described in connectionwith FIG. 4 . In connection with FIG. 4 the following scheme can beperformed (which follows the diagrammatic flow in FIG. 4 from top tobottom):

-   -   (1) Initialize all to |0>_(g) via optical pumping (OP).    -   (2) Local g-type Raman of data to |1>_(g).    -   (3) Global HSS of |0>_(g)↔|0>_(m).    -   (4) Algorithm via g-type 1 and 2-qubit Raman gates.    -   (5A) Global HSS of |0>_(g)↔|0>_(m); |1>_(g)↔|1>_(m) (m-type).    -   (6Ai) Global sympathetic cooling in g-type space.    -   (6Aii) Calibration via local Raman and “low-fi” or low-fidelity        readout on coolant: Ramsey, carrier Rabi (B-field, etc.),        sideband Rabi (trap frequency).    -   (7A) Global HSS of |0>_(g)↔|0>_(m); |1>_(g)↔|1>_(m).    -   Repeat 4-7.

EXAMPLE—(A−ALTERNATIVE) SYMPATHETIC COOLING/CALIBRATION

An example of an alternative sympathetic cooling/calibration requiringHSS beam with only m-type splitting is described in connection with FIG.5 . In connection with FIG. 5 the following scheme can be performed(which follows the diagrammatic flow in FIG. 5 from top to bottom):

-   -   (1) Initialize all to |0>_(g) via OP.    -   (2) Local g-type Raman of data to |1>_(g).    -   (3) Global HSS of |0>_(g)↔|0>_(m).    -   (4) Algorithm via g-type 1 and 2-qubit Raman gates.    -   (5A) Global HSS of |0>_(g)↔|0>_(m) (o-type).    -   (6A) Local OR global g-type Raman of all ions; since global is        OK, this could be u-wave driven.    -   (7A) Global HSS of |0>_(g)↔|1>_(m) (m-type).    -   (8Ai/ii) Global sympathetic cooling in g-type space/cal.    -   (9A) Reverse steps 7A-5A.

EXAMPLE—(B) ANCILLA READOUT

An example of an ancilla readout is described in connection with FIG. 6. In connection with FIG. 6 the following scheme can be performed (whichfollows the diagrammatic flow in FIG. 6 from top to bottom):

-   -   (1) Initialize all to |0>_(g) via OP.    -   (2) Local g-type Raman of data to |1>_(g).    -   (3) Global HSS of |0>_(g)↔|0>_(m).    -   (4) Algorithm via g-type 1 and 2-qubit Raman gates.    -   (5B) Global HSS of |1>_(g)↔|1>_(m) (both qubits o-type).    -   (6B) Local g-type Raman of ancilla to |1>_(g).    -   (7B) Global HSS of |0>_(g)↔|0>_(m) (o-type ancilla, m-type        data).    -   (8B) Readout only ancilla with global detection lasers and pump        to |0>_(g).    -   (9B1) Global HSS of |1>_(m)↔|1>_(g).    -   (9B2) Local g-type Raman on ancilla conditioned on ancilla        readout.    -   (10B) Global HSS of |0>_(m)↔|0>_(g)→5A.

EXAMPLE—(C) MID-ALGORITHM CALIBRATION VIA ANCILLA

An example of a mid-algorithm calibration via ancilla is described inconnection with FIG. 7 . In connection with FIG. 7 the following schemecan be performed (which follows the diagrammatic flow in FIG. 7 from topto bottom):

-   -   (1) Initialize all to |0>_(g) via OP.    -   (2) Local g-type Raman of data to |1>_(g).    -   (3) Global HSS of |0>_(g)↔|0>_(m).    -   (4C) Calibration via local Raman on ancilla: Ramsey, carrier        Rabi (B -field, etc.), sideband Rabi (trap frequency).    -   (5B) Global HSS of |1>_(g)↔|1>_(m).    -   (6B) Local g-type Raman of ancilla |1>_(g).    -   (7B) Global HSS of |0>_(g)↔|0>_(m) (creates o-type ancilla).    -   (8B) Readout only ancilla with global detection lasers.    -   (9B1) Global HSS of |1>_(m)↔|1>_(g).    -   (9B2) Local g-type Raman on ancilla conditioned on ancilla        readout.    -   (10B) Global HSS of |0>_(m)↔|0>_(g)→5A.

EXAMPLE—(D) REG AND DISTRIBUTION VIA ANCILLA

An example of a REG and distribution via ancilla is described inconnection with FIGS. 8 and 9 . In connection with FIG. 8 the followingscheme can be performed (which follows the diagrammatic flow in FIG. 8from top to bottom):

-   -   (1) Initialize all to |0>_(g) via OP.    -   (2) Local g-type Raman of data to |1>_(g).    -   (3) Global HSS of |0>_(g)↔|0>_(m).    -   (4C) Calibration via local Raman on ancilla: Ramsey, carrier        Rabi (B-field, etc.), sideband Rabi (trap frequency).    -   (5B) Global HSS of |1>_(g)↔|1>_(m).    -   (6B) Local g-type Raman of ancilla |1>_(g).    -   (7B) Global HSS of |0>_(g)↔|0>_(m) (creates o-type ancilla).    -   (8B) Readout only ancilla with global detection laser.    -   (9D) REG attempts and sympathetic cooling interleaved.

In connection with FIG. 9 the scheme described above is continued (byfollowing the diagrammatic flow in FIG. 9 from top to bottom):

Step (9D) is now shown at the top and was last step shown in FIG. 9 .(9D) REG attempts and sympathetic cooling interleaved.

-   -   (10D) Global HSS of |0>_(g)↔|0>_(m)    -   (11D) Local g-type Raman on REG ancilla.    -   (12Di) Global HSS of |1>_(g)↔|1>_(m)    -   (12Dii) Global HSS of |0>_(g)↔|0>_(m)    -   (13D) Local g-type Raman on REG ancilla.    -   (14D) Global HSS of |0>_(g)↔|0>_(m)    -   (15D) Entanglement distribution in g-type using single species        2q gates.

HILBERT SPACE SHUTTLING (HSS)

In connection with HSS, questions may come up about how good the 1762-nmpulses are. Blatt/Home claim fidelities of 5e⁻⁵ in ⁴⁰Ca⁺ (729 nm) andothers have been able to do ˜4e⁻⁴ in ⁸⁸Sr⁺ (674 nm, GST). One aspectincludes potentially using composite pulses to improve. Moreover, the1762 pulse is likely to be better than 674, 729 pulses due to smallerDebye-Waller factors (DWs). But probably may want to use the global 1762along radial direction to keep DWs low.

Another possible consideration relates to the 1762 pulse phase. Theoptical phase gets imprinted on the o-type but gets removed whenconverting back to g-type as long as laser is coherent over o-type dwelltime. For the o-type, coherence times of 10-100 milliseconds (ms) areachievable.

For the m-type, only the phase difference between the |0>_(g)↔|0>_(m)and |1>_(g)↔|1>_(m) beams matters. One approach is to derive both beamsfrom same laser, minimize path length differences.

Another question that may come up is the AC Stark shifts from global1762 pulses. For the g-type: Δ=10 GHz gives δ_(AC)˜25 Hz. For the m-typeΔ=80 MHz gives δ_(AC)˜3 kHz. Only occurs for F=1 to F′=3 beam (F=0 toF′=3 is quadrupole forbidden). Can potentially use spin echo to cancel,or just keep track of the Zgate rotation

Yet another question that may come up is the number of 1762 tones/lasersthat may be needed. The scheme described above needs independent 1762tones separated by ˜10 GHz. An example of such implementation isdescribed below. A modified version only requires 1762 tones separatedby ˜80 MHz mid-circuit REG is given up. However, REG is a longer-termgoal with other technical challenges to consider.

M-TYPE RAMAN GATES

Other aspects of the present disclosure may include implementing m-typeRaman gates. M-type Raman gates may implement the same classes offeatures as in the g-type Raman scheme as described below. An example ofm-type Raman gates is described in connection with FIG. 10 .Fundamentally higher-fidelity gates for ¹³³Ba⁺ with Raman laser at 532nm. D_(5/2) only couples to P_(3/2) so it is possible to get 1/Δ Rabirate even for Δ>>ω_(HFS). Wins the war against spontaneous emission(˜1/Δ²)→˜5× error reduction.

This approach is technically simpler, with straightforward CW Raman ifdesired. CW Raman also can be used for g-type Raman. Can use AOM insteadof EOM to span qubit frequency.

In addition, circuit performance is largely insensitive to imperfectHSS. The need for HSS transfers during the computation is either reduced(Class II functions) or eliminated altogether (Class I functions), whichsignificantly reduces the impact of imperfect HSS transfer on thecomputation fidelity.

TWO CLASSES OF FEATURES WITH M-TYPE RAMAN: CLASS I—QUBITS PLUSCOOLANT/CALIBRATION IONS

The first class of features with m-type Raman, CLASS I, is described inconnection with FIG. 11 shown below. In connection with CLASS I thefollowing scheme can be performed (as illustrated in FIG. 11 ):

-   -   (1) Initialize: Separate qubits and coolant ions into g        (S_(1/2)) and m (D_(5/2)) manifolds with global HSS. Transfer        only qubit ions to m manifold.    -   (2) Run circuit in m manifold (now has Raman) while        interspersing cooling/calibration with ions in g manifold (has        Raman, EIT cooling, readout, pumping). No HSS required during        circuit/cooling/calibration.    -   (3) Transfer one qubit state to o-type for high-fidelity readout        of qubits with global HSS.

The use of CLASS I enables (without HSS duringcircuit/cooling/calibration): (1) Sympathetic cooling of any flavor withperfect mass-matching, coolant ion placement reconfigurable on aper-circuit basis without physical shuttling, and (2) Mid-circuitcalibration routines on coolant ions that have hyperfine qubit statesidentical to those of the qubits. The use of CLASS I requires only|0>_(g)↔|0>_(m) transitions for HSS, no m-type AC Stark shifts. Also, itrequires only m-type Raman, not g-type.

TWO CLASSES OF FEATURES WITH M-TYPE RAMAN: CLASS II—QUBITS PLUS ANCILLAEPLUS COOLANT IONS

The second class of features with m-type Raman, CLASS II, is describedin connection with FIG. 12 . In connection with CLASS II the followingscheme can be performed (as illustrated in FIG. 12 ):

-   -   (1) Perform partial algorithm with data qubits and ancillas in        m-type.    -   (2) Transfer only ancillas to o-type and data to m-type via HSS        and hi-fi readout of ancillas.    -   (3) Move ancilla qubits back to qubit manifold and continue        circuit.    -   (4) Sympathetic cooling/calibration can also be interspersed at        any time (Class A is a subset of B).

As before, Class II functions require more HSS than Class I, but bothneed ONLY local m- and g-type Raman and global HSS, cooling, andreadout.

The use of CLASS II enables: (1) Mid-circuit partial readout of quantumregister without physical shuttling, and (2) mid-circuit REG withoutphysical shuttling.

SCHEME FOR NULLING HSS LASER PHASE NOISE BY DRIVING BOTH HSS TRANSITIONSSIMULTANEOUSLY (CLASS I FUNCTIONS)

One source of error in this approach can be phase noise in the laserused to drive the HSS transition. This noise is technical but intrinsic;it can be reduced by locking the laser phase to a suitably stablereference, but it cannot be completely eliminated. In particular, thislaser phase noise might impart phase noise onto our qubits every time aswap of the ancilla and qubit ions between the g and m manifolds takesplace. For example, by driving the |0>_(g) to |0>_(m) HSS transitionfollowed sequentially by the |1>_(g) to |1>_(m) transition (or viceversa), then any drift in the laser phase between the times of these twotransitions is imprinted into a relative phase between |0>_(m) and|1>_(m), which enters into and degrades the fidelity of the calculation.

In other words, in performing the two HSS transitions sequentially,there is a brief storage of the qubit information in the optical qubit,when the qubit is divided between the g and m manifolds. During thistime, any drift between the phases of the optical qubit and laser isimprinted on the qubit phase when the transfer is completed to the mmanifold.

The techniques described herein can be used as a solution to the problemoutlined above. The impact of laser phase noise on the qubit phase canbe nulled by driving the |0>_(g) to |0>_(m) and |1>_(g) to |1>_(m)transitions simultaneously. The laser phase at the transition is commonto both |0>_(m) and |1>_(m) and therefore does not introduce anerroneous phase into the calculation. In other words, the qubitinformation is at no time stored in the optical qubit, eliminating theopportunity for laser phase noise to be converted into qubit phaseerror.

If the laser phase noise is sufficiently large, it can cause imperfecttransfer (i.e., the population in |0>_(g) is not fully transferred to|0>_(m)), but, as elucidated elsewhere, this scheme is sufficientlygeneral so as to enable to use BB1 or other pulse sequences, which aredesigned to optimize transfer even in the presence of experimentalimperfections like phase noise. Further, an error of imperfect transfer,unlike an error of laser phase being imprinted onto the qubit, can beeasily detected, in which case it is possible to choose to either rejectthe calculation result if it is impacted by the error or accept thecalculation result if it is not.

This solution is particularly useful for the Class I functions in thescheme that does not use m-state Raman, wherein it always drives the twoHSS transitions together in the midst of the calculation (i.e., notduring initialization and readout). Therefore, this technique caneliminate the impact of laser phase noise on the qubit phase foralgorithms that use only Class I functions.

SCHEME FOR NULLING HSS LASER PHASE NOISE BY PERFORMING AN ECHO SEQUENCE(CLASS II FUNCTIONS)

The technique of driving the |0>_(g) to |0>_(m) and |1>_(g) to |1>_(m)transitions simultaneously to prevent laser phase noise from beingimprinted on the qubit only works when no other operations need to beperformed in between these two transitions. This is not the case forClass II transitions. For example, for ancilla readout, one HSStransition (either |0>_(g) to |0>_(m) or |1>_(g) to |1>_(m)) is driven,then select out the ancilla ions to read out by applying a Raman pulseto those ions, and then drive the other HSS transition. Because theRaman transition inevitably has a finite duration, this sequence issusceptible to imprinting laser phase noise onto the qubit phase noise.

In other words, storing the qubit information in an optical qubit for afinite amount of time will be needed, creating the opportunity for laserphase noise to be converted into qubit phase error.

The techniques described herein can be used as a solution to the problemoutlined above. The basic concept is that the phase noise in the laseris transferred to the qubit when the qubit information is imprinted onthe optical qubit during the Raman pulse. To “echo out” this phaseerror, an echo pulse is applied to the optical qubit after the Ramanpulse by driving the |0>_(g) to |0>_(m) and |1>_(g) to |1>_(m)transitions simultaneously, which has the effect of flipping the opticalqubit. This causes the laser phase noise to be imprinted on the opticalqubit with the opposite sign. There is a wait after the echo pulse for aperiod of time equal to the duration of the Raman pulse beforecompleting the transition to the m manifold, so the errors imprintedbefore and after the echo pulse cancel each other. If the rate at whichthe laser phase drifts is constant, then this cancellation can, inprinciple, be perfect. This echo technique therefore eliminates the OMGscheme's susceptibility to a laser phase that drifts at a constant rate,rendering the scheme instead susceptible only to the change in the rateat which the laser phase drifts over the course of the echo sequence.

An additional level of echoing can be applied to further reduce theOMG's scheme's susceptibility to laser phase noise over the course ofperforming a Class II function. In the case of mid-circuit ancillareadout, it is possible to echo the phase noise as described above whileseparating out the readout ancillae from the other qubits. Aspects ofthe present disclosure may also include reversing this operation afterperforming the readout in order to fold the readout ancillae back intothe qubit register. By applying additional echo pulses to this secondoperation, it is possible to null the scheme's susceptibility not onlyto a laser phase that drifts at a constant rate but also to a laserphase that drifts at a rate that is itself changing at a constant rateover the course of the entire readout operation. Essentially, thesequence of HSS transitions is driven in such a way that if, forexample, the optical qubit acquired phase noise with a positive signfollowed by a negative sign for the initial ancillae-separationsequence, it acquires phase error with a negative sign followed by apositive sign for the ancillae-refolding sequence. Therefore, not onlyare the ancillae-separation and ancillae-refolding sequences themselvesindividually echoed to cancel phase error acquired within each sequence,but they are constructed in such a way that the phase noise acquiredduring the ancillae-refolding sequence cancels that acquired during theancillae-separation sequence.

FIG. 13 illustrates an example of scheme for performing an echo sequenceaccording to aspects of the present disclosure. Specifically, FIG. 13may illustrate an example of in-circuit, echoed partial readout withoutshuttling or D-state Raman. In connection with FIG. 13 the followingscheme may be performed (which follows the diagrammatic flow in FIG. 13from top to bottom):

-   -   1) Global HSS of |0>_(g)↔|0>_(m).    -   2) Wait time T, then global HSS of |0>_(g)↔|0>_(m);        |1>_(g)↔|1>_(m).    -   3) Local g-type Raman of ancilla to |1>_(g), duration T.    -   4) Global HSS of |0>_(g)↔|0>_(m).    -   5) Readout only ancilla with global detection lasers and pump to        |0>_(g).    -   6) Global HSS of |1>_(g)↔|1>_(m).    -   7) Local g-type Raman on ancilla conditioned on ancilla readout,        duration T.    -   8) Global HSS of |0>_(g)↔|0>_(m); |1>_(g)↔|1>_(m).    -   9) Wait time T, then global HSS of |1>_(g)↔|1>_(m).

FIG. 14 illustrates an example of an alternative scheme for performing adouble echoed sequence according to aspects of the present disclosure.The scheme may continue after step 4 of the scheme shown in FIG. 13 . Inconnection with FIG. 14 the following scheme may be performed (whichfollows the diagrammatic flow in FIG. 14 from top to bottom):

-   -   5) After partial readout.    -   6) Global HSS of |0>_(g)↔|0>_(m); |1>_(g)↔|1>_(m).    -   7) Global HSS of |1>_(g)↔|1>_(m).    -   8) Wait time T, then global HSS of |0>_(g)↔|0>_(m);        |1>_(g)↔|1>_(m).    -   9) Local g-type Raman on ancilla conditioned on ancilla readout,        duration T.    -   10) Global HSS of |1>_(g)↔|1>_(m).

SCHEMES FOR LOCK-AND-KEY CLOCK PULSES FOR DSSS ARCHITECTURE

In the implementation of the DSSS architecture, there is a class offeatures that may require separating a set of ancillae qubits out of thequbit register, performing an operation on them, and then folding themback into the register. These operations include reading out the statesof the ancillae qubits and using the ancillae qubits to generate remoteentanglement between distant qubit registers.

As described above, the processes of separating out the ancillae andthen folding them back into the register may require us to apply asequence of global clock pulses, Raman pulses on the ancillae only (andnot the other qubits, such as the data qubits), and/or then more globalclock pulses. If the global clock pulses and individual Raman pulses areapplied separately and in sequence, then there may be periods of timewhen both the ancilla and data qubits are stored as optical qubits, withparts of their population in the ground and metastable manifolds. As aresult, any optical phase noise on the clock laser during these periodsmay be imprinted as either phase or population error on the data qubits,which may be undesirable. Some aspects include using a series ofadditional wait times and clock pulses to echo out the impact of opticalphase noise to successive orders. However, these additional waits andclock pulses may slow the computation and/or introduce moreopportunities for errors to occur. Therefore, improvements may bedesirable.

An aspect of the present disclosure is to devise a method to separateout the ancilla qubits without the need to transfer portions of thepopulation of the data qubits between the ground and metastablemanifolds. For example, one aspect of the present disclosure includesapplying the global clock and individual Raman pulses contemporaneously,with the clock pulses designed to suppress driving the clock transitionexcept in ions that are also being addressed by a Raman beam. Here, theclock transition may be “locked” but can be driven by using the Ramanbeam as the “key.”

Turning to FIG. 15 , a first aspect of the present disclosure mayinclude selectively driving a narrow optical transition in ions ortrapped atoms by using an individually-addressed beam to apply a Starkshift to the specific ions or trapped atoms, which may bring them intoresonance with a narrow optical transition that is driven by a globalbeam. Specifically, the Stark shift scheme discusses herein may includeusing a detuned Raman beam to cause a Stark shift in the |1_(g)

state from the unshifted energy (dashed line in FIG. 15 ). For example,aspects of the present disclosure start with both the data and ancillaqubits shelved in the metastable manifold, and the transfer of thepopulation of the ancilla qubits only from the metastable state |m

to one of the ground qubit states. In this technique, the Raman beam maybe detuned away from the transition between the ground qubit states|0_(g)

and |1_(g)

a frequency Δ. This may have the effect of applying a Stark shift δ tothe |1_(g)

state, which is given by

δ=−Ω_(R) ²/Δ,   (1)

where Ω_(R) is the Raman Rabi frequency. Next, the clock laser isdetuned, which couples the metastable state |m

with the Stark-shifted state |1_(g)

to match. The clock transition is then driven at its Rabi rate Ω_(C) inthe ion that is addressed by the Raman beam, but the off-resonanttransition may be suppressed in the other ions to which a Stark shift isnot applied.

In some aspects, there may be a probability of

ε˜(Ω_(C)/δ)²   (2)

that the data qubits are erroneously transferred to |1_(g)

. It may be desirable to increase δ to as large as possible by raisingthe Raman Rabi frequency Ω_(R) while lowering the Raman detuning Δ.However, this may be limited by a limitation of not actually driving theRaman transition while attempting to drive the clock transition. If theratio (Ω_(R)/Δ)² is not sufficiently small, an aspect may includetransferring the population from |1_(g)

to |0_(g)

while transferring the population from |m

to |1_(g)

. The dynamics of this three-level system may be more complex, and itmay be difficult to find a region in parameter space that satisfies thesimultaneous criteria for driving the clock transition in the ancillaqubits and not driving the clock transition in the data qubits with veryhigh fidelities.

However, the DSSS architecture is relatively forgiving of the errorwhere population is transferred from |m

to |0_(g)

instead of |1_(g)

. If this error occurs as we are separating out the ancilla qubit fromthe register prior to performing partial readout or REG, then it isimmaterial whether the ancilla qubit ends up in |0_(g)

or |1_(g)

because the next step is to either perform a projective readout ofwhether the ancilla qubit is in the ground manifold or initialize theancilla qubit in order to generate remote entanglement, both of whichare insensitive to which S-manifold qubit state the ancilla is in.

If, on the other hand, this error occurs as we are folding the ancillaqubit back into the register, then having the ancilla end up in |0_(g)

instead of |1_(g)

does represent an error. However, this error can be detected byperforming a projective readout that determines which ions are in theground manifold while the data qubits are shelved in the metastablemanifold. This concept is expanded upon elsewhere, but this techniquewould enable us to detect a failure in the transition technique wedescribe here. Upon detecting this failure, we could disregard theresult of the run on which the failure occurred. Alternatively, we couldcorrect the failure in real time by reinitializing the ancilla qubit orregenerating remote entanglement and then attempting to fold the ancillaqubit into the register again.

Turning to FIG. 16 , a second aspect of the present disclosure mayinclude a three-photon scheme where the Raman and clock beams are bothdetuned by 4 and the population may be transferred directly from |m

to |0_(g)

. An aspect of the present disclosure may include taking advantage ofthe three-level nature of the |0_(g)

−|1_(g)

−|m

system. In this method, both the Raman and clock beams may be detuned bythe same frequency Δ, which is larger than Ω_(R) and Ω_(C). In thisregime, the population may be transferred directly from |m

to |0_(g)

at a rate of

Ω_(m0)=Ω_(R)*Ω_(C)/Δ.   (3)

Aspects of the present disclosure may be a three-photon Raman processwhere one of the two interactions is itself a two-photon Raman process.

In this scheme, the probability of erroneously transferring a data qubitto the ground state is

ε˜(Ω_(C)/Δ)².   (4)

To minimize this error, aspects of the present disclosure includeincreasing the magnitude of Δ, which may undesirably reduce thetransition rate. It may be possible to mitigate this slowdown byincreasing Ω_(R), but that comes at the cost of degrading the assumptionthat |1_(g)

is populated only virtually. As a result, it might be challenging toreduce ε to an acceptable level in the data qubits while transferringthe ancilla qubits from |m

to |0_(g)

with an acceptable fidelity in an acceptable time.

In a third aspect of the present disclosure, the Raman and clock pulsesmay be offset in time and have variable intensities. In the secondaspect, the Raman and clock pulses may be applied simultaneously withstatic amplitudes, which results in population oscillating between |m

and |0_(g)

. If the pulses are offset and applied with slowly-varying amplitudesthat result in Ω_(R) and Ω_(C) following trajectories that are similarto those depicted in FIG. 17 , then the population may be transferredadiabatically from |m

to |0_(g)

and no population may be transferred to |1_(g)

. This may be referred to as the stimulated Raman adiabatic passage(STIRAP) process.

In some aspects, both the Raman and clock drives may be detuned awayfrom resonance by a nonzero frequency Δ in order to avoid driving anyunwanted clock transitions in the data qubits. The STIRAP process may bethe most efficient at Δ=0, so the nonzero detuning may result in aslower transition. In general, the Rabi frequency trajectories may betraversed at a rate that is slower than the Rabi frequencies themselves.Specifically, to drive a faster transition, Δ should be small and bothΩ_(R) and Ω_(C) (at the maximum points of their respective trajectories)should be large, but this may cause larger errors in the form oftransferring some proportion of the ancilla qubits to |1_(g)

rather than |0_(g)

or driving the clock transition in the data qubits.

A fourth aspect of the present disclosure includes using an echoingtechnique to coherently cancel erroneous transfer of the data qubitsfrom |m

to the ground state manifold. This cancellation may relax therequirements on Ω_(R), Ω_(C), and Δ, enabling the optimization for speedand minimizing the unwanted population in |1_(g)

.

Aspects of the present disclosure include the second aspect above, andperiodically changing the phase of the optical beam by π andsimultaneously change the sign of the detuning Δ that is applied to boththe clock and Raman beams. This may reverse any unwanted populationtransfer in the data qubits. The optical beam may cause a small rotationon the Bloch sphere about an axis that, because Δ>>Ω_(C), may be closeto the z axis. Changing both the phase and detuning of the optical beammay invert this rotation axis through the origin, so any small rotationthat occurred in the first period may be canceled in the second period.

In certain aspects, this echoing process described above may beperformed at a high frequency (e.g., 1, 10, or 100 kilohertz) pursuantto technical limitations and the requirement of applying an even numberof segments. This cancellation is susceptible to phase or amplitudenoise on the clock beam that is faster than the inverse of the echoperiod, so echoing faster may enhance the degree of cancellation thatcan be achieved.

In some aspects, this scheme may have the ancillary benefit of cancelingany Stark shift in the data qubits due to off-resonant driving of thespecific optical transition we are using. Note that smaller Stark shiftsin the data qubits due to other clock transitions may not be canceled,and they may be required to be calibrated and compensated. However,these shifts may be small because those transitions should be severalmegahertz away relative to a typical Rabi frequency of a few tens ofkilohertz.

In some aspects, this echoing does not inhibit transfer of the ancillaqubits from |m

to |0_(g)

because, with reference to Eq. (3), this echoing process inverts thesigns of both Ω_(C) and Δ, which together leave the sign of Ω_(m0)unchanged. The echoing of the clock beam may an odd-parity process thatnulls the unwanted transfer of the data qubits due to the clock beamalone, but combining that echoing with the odd-parity process offlipping the detuning of the Raman beam may result in the desiredtransition from |m

to |0_(g)

remained allowed.

In a fifth aspect of the present disclosure, the STIRAP proceduredescribed in the third aspect can be echoed in a similar way. If thephase of the clock drive is reversed and the sign of Δ is changed at arate is much faster than the rate of change of Ω_(C), then the clocktransition may be suppressed for the data qubits.

Similar to the fourth aspect above, the Raman drive may be modulated insuch a way as to allow the STIRAP transition for the ancilla qubits thatare addressed by the Raman beams. STIRAP functions because the Raman andclock interactions together create a dark state

|D

=(Ω_(C)(t)|0_(g)

−Ω_(R)(t)|m

)/(Ω_(C)(t)²+Ω_(R)(t)²)^(1/2)   (5)

that evolves in time as Ω_(R) and Ω_(C) traverse their respectivetrajectories. If the phases of Ω_(C)(t) and Ω_(R)(t) are both changedsimultaneously, then the dark state will remain unchanged (other than anirrelevant global phase).

Aspects of the present disclosure includes an advantage such that theechoing, in suppressing the clock transition in the data qubits, relaxesthe requirements on Ω_(C) and Δ, and enabling the optimization for speedand the minimization of the unwanted population in |1_(g)

.

In some implementations, the aspects described above may be integratedinto the DSSS architecture. Any one or more of the described techniquesmay be extended to enable 1) the simultaneous transfer of multipleancilla qubits by the simultaneous application of individual Raman beamsto each ancilla qubit, 2) the transfer of population from one of theground states to one metastable state rather vice versa, as is describedhere, and/or 3) an echoing technique that is implemented by applying twosimultaneous, symmetrically detuned tones on both the Raman and clockdrives rather than one tone on each whose phase and detuning areperiodically inverted.

An aspect of the present disclosure includes one or more of the Lock andKey techniques described above being implemented to the DSSSarchitecture.

An aspect of the present disclosure includes the aspects above, with twoconstituent transitions being a Raman transition and narrow opticaltransition.

An aspect of the present disclosure includes any of the aspects above,further including the fourth aspect and/or the use of an echoingtechnique to suppress population transfer by the first drive in a lambdasystem in qubits to which the second drive is not applied.

An aspect of the present disclosure includes any of the aspects above,further including the approach of applying a matching echo to the seconddrive in a lambda system to enable the composite transition in qubits towhich both drives are applied.

An aspect of the present disclosure includes any of the aspects above,further including the STIRAP technique as described in the fifth aspect.

SCHEMES FOR HIGH-FIDELITY HSS WITH A GLOBAL BEAM

A problem that may arise is that for a laser beam of finite sizeglobally addressing a long chain of ions from a direction that is notalong the chain axis, there will be a limit to the fidelity of thepi-pulses due to inhomogeneity of the laser intensity over the chain.For example, a 32-ion chain with 3-micron ion spacing; global beam with85-micron radius centered on chain, propagating normal to the chain axisgives pi-pulse fidelity of only 0.84 for the edge ions (1 and 32) if thelaser intensity is chosen to drive a perfect pi-pulse on the center ion.

This disclosure provides two exemplary embodiments (e.g., exemplaryschemes or aspects) that address the problem outlined above.

Scheme 1: Make the laser beam larger only in the direction along thechain axis (high-eccentricity elliptical beam). In the example above,make the beam radius 600 microns to get HSS error on outer ions to<1e−4. This will require 2.66× the time for the pi-pulse HSS transferfor the same laser power.

Scheme 2: Use a coherent quantum pulse sequence to minimize pi-pulseinfidelity due to inhomogeneous laser intensity. One can use the BB1sequence (e.g., http://cds.cern.ch/record/599468/files/0301019.pdf for ageneral outline of BB1) and the same (e.g., 85 micron) beam size(low-eccentricity elliptical beam). This can also achieve <1e−4. HSSerrors but would take 1.9× longer than scheme.

Scheme 1 vs Scheme 2: Scheme 2 is better if it is undesirable to have alarge beam for optical access reasons. Scheme 1 is better if one wantsfaster HSS transfer (for fixed laser power) or smaller required laserpower (for fixed transfer time). Another advantage of Scheme 1 is thatby not requiring BB1, pulse sequences can be used that are optimized forother kinds of transfer errors (e.g., frequency or phase noise).

LASER SCHEME FOR HIGH-FIDELITY DUAL-SPACE OPERATION

A laser scheme for high-fidelity dual-space operation is described inconnection with FIG. 18 . This laser beam scheme (propagationdirection/polarizations/B-field orientation) is very well suited tohigh-fidelity dual-space operation.

Individual Raman configuration minimizes deleterious AC Stark shiftswhen using pulsed lasers.

Global HSS is typically driven by an atomic quadrupole transition. TheHSS beam orientations shown in FIG. 18 maximize the transition rate. Forlong-wavelength HSS laser (e.g., 1762 nanometer (nm) for Ba+ ions), thesmall Lamb-Dicke parameter results in small HSS transfer errors (<1e−4)even for significant thermal population of axial modes (nbar=50) in a32-ion chain.

The polarization of the HSS beam depends on the specific sattes in them-state manifold that are used during the HSS sequence. For clock states(i.e., those with m_(F)=0), a polarization perpendicular to the magneticfield may be utilized to maximize the transition rate. However, thereare other states (so-called “first-order field-insensitive” or “FOFI”states) that have nonzero values of m_(F) but whose relative frequenciesare insensitive to magnetic fields to first order. For these states,which have |m_(F)|=1, the transition rate is maximized by setting thepolarization to lie in the plane defined by the direction of beampropagation and the magnetic field.

SCHEME TO ENABLE SIMULTANEOUS DRIVING OF ONE OR TWO HSS TRANSITIONSUSING AN AOM AND EOM

There is a need to implement a technical solution that enables drivingeither (1) the |0>_(g) to |0>_(m) and |1>_(g) to |1>_(m) transitionssimultaneously or (2) transition individually. Because these transitionscan be separated in frequency by many GHz for many ion species, this maybe technically challenging.

In an exemplary aspect, this is accomplished by using an electro-opticmodulator (EOM) to apply two sets of sidebands so that one sideband fromeach set addressed each transition. These two sets of sidebands couldthen be turned on together or individually to drive one or bothtransitions. However, this would unavoidably divide the optical powerbetween five tones (two in each set of sidebands plus the carrier),which would raise the power that is required from the optical systemupstream of the EOM.

Alternatively, this is accomplished in an exemplary aspect by using anacousto-optic modulator (AOM) and EOM in series. The EOM would modulatethe laser frequency to address the two transitions, one with the EOMcarrier and one with one sideband. This reduces the amount of power thatwould be wasted since only one set of sidebands would need to begenerated. However, since the power in the carrier cannot be nulled, theAOM is needed to modulate the overall power in the beam. For thisapproach, it would be easy to address both transitions and to addressonly the transition addressed by the EOM carrier by turning off the EOMsideband, but it would be difficult to address only the transitionaddressed by the EOM sideband. To accomplish this, the drive frequenciesof both the EOM and AOM could be shifted by equal amounts to detune thecarrier away from its transition but leave the carrier resonant with itstransition. However, in this case, the finite bandwidth of the AOM,which is often limited to a few tens of MHz unless special measures aretaken, would force us to balance off-resonant excitation of the unwantedtransition versus the speed at which the transition is driven.

A solution to the problem outlined above is to use an AOM and EOM insequence, as in the second scheme listed above, but with the extensionof using independent control of the AOM and EOM phases to cancelexcitation of the unwanted transition. The phase of the optical tonecorresponding to the EOM carrier is given by the phase of the AOM drivephase alone, but the phase of the optical tone corresponding to the EOMsideband is given by the sum of the phases of the AOM and EOM drivetones. As described elsewhere, the BB1 and related composite pulsesequences consist of a nominal rotation pulse followed by somecorrection pulses whose rotation angles are fixed but whose phasesdepend on the nominal rotation angle. Halfway through the nominalrotation pulse, it is possible to change the phases of the AOM and EOMdrive tones by pi. This results in the phase of the carrier optical tonechanging by pi and the phase of the sideband optical tone changing by2*pi, which is equivalent to its phase remaining unchanged. Thus, thesideband transition gets a nominal rotation angle of pi, and the carriertransition gets a nominal rotation angle of 0. Then the correctionpulses are applied on both transitions, using the same technique withthe AOM and EOM phases to give the correction pulses the proper phasesfor nominal angles of 0 and pi.

This scheme can be extended to the case where the strengths of the twoHSS transitions are equal (i.e., the two transitions are driven at equalrates for a given optical power). In this case, the two transitions canbe driven with the same set of EOM sidebands, which are intrinsicallypower-matched. This obviates the need to precisely calibrate the powerof the optical powers of the EOM sidebands to match that of the EOMcarrier. In this case, the phase of one optical tone is given by the sumof the phases of the AOM and EOM drives, and the phase of the otheroptical tone is given by their difference. Halfway through the nominalrotation pulse, it is possible to change the phase of the AOM drive by+pi/2 and the phase of the EOM drive by either +pi/2 or −pi/2. Thisresults in the phase of one of the optical tones changing by pi and thephase of the other remaining unchanged. As above, one of the transitionsgets a nominal rotation angle of pi, and the other gets a nominalrotation angle of 0. Then the correction pulses are applied on bothtransitions, again setting the phases of the AOM and EOM drive to givethe correction pulses the proper phases for nominal angles of 0 and pi.This technique enables to drive either transition, and it is possible todrive both by not changing the phases of the AOM and EOM drives.

In general, the dual-space, single-species architecture for trapped-ionfor quantum information processing described herein is flexible and hasseveral advantages over architectures that rely on dual species. Forexample, a single chain of ions is reconfigurable as needed withoutphysical shuttling. Also, sympathetic cooling can be perfectlymass-matched. It should be appreciated that the exemplary aspects hereindo not require narrow line cooling, which itself may be a risk, and maynot get as cold as (electromagnetically-induced-transparency) EITcooling. This approach also enables mid-algorithm readout and remoteentanglement generation (REG) on dipole-allowed (broad) transitions forhigh speed. Moreover, no mixed-species two-qubit (2q) gate for REdistribution.

The use of a global 1762 optical beam for dual-space, single-speciesarchitectures is already considered for shelving during readout. Onlythe short-wavelength Raman need be focused tightly for addressing. Butfor the approach using g-type gates (ground qubit gates), anotherindependent tone may be needed 10 GHz away. This may be accomplishedwith a second laser and a high frequency acousto-optic modulator (AOM).AC Stark shifts of the m-type (metastable qubit), including from the iontrap RF, needs to be considered/managed. The global 1762 optical beamwould also allow for integrated photonics down the road.

The dual-space, single-species architecture can also support m-typeRaman operations, which can produce higher-fidelity and more efficientgates. Such an approach only needs the 1762 tones spaced by ˜80 MHz (not10 GHz) with local m-type and g-type Raman.

FIG. 19 is a block diagram that illustrates an example of a QIP system1900 in accordance with aspects of this disclosure in which thetechniques described above for a dual-space, single species trapped-ionarchitecture can be implemented. The QIP system 1900 may also bereferred to as a quantum computing system, a computer device, a trappedion system, or the like.

The QIP system 1900 can include a source 1960 that provides atomicspecies (e.g., a plume or flux of neutral atoms) to a chamber 1950having an ion trap 1970 that traps the atomic species once ionized(e.g., photoionized). The ion trap 1970 may be part of a processor orprocessing portion of the QIP system 1900. The source 1960 may beimplemented separate from the chamber 1950.

The imaging system 1930 can include a high-resolution imager (e.g., CCDcamera) for monitoring the atomic ions while they are being provided tothe ion trap or after they have been provided to the ion trap 1970. Inan aspect, the imaging system 1930 can be implemented separate from theoptical and trap controller 1920, however, the use of fluorescence todetect, identify, and label atomic ions using image processingalgorithms may need to be coordinated with the optical and trapcontroller 1920.

The QIP system 1900 may also include an algorithms component 1910 thatmay operate with other parts of the QIP system 1900 (not shown) toperform quantum algorithms or quantum operations, including a stack orsequence of combinations of single qubit operations and/or multi-qubitoperations (e.g., two-qubit operations) as well as extended quantumcomputations. As such, the algorithms component 1910 may provideinstructions to various components of the QIP system 1900 (e.g., to theoptical and trap controller 1920) to enable the implementation of thequantum algorithms or quantum operations.

Referring now to FIG. 20 , illustrated is an example computer system ordevice 2000 in accordance with aspects of the disclosure. The computerdevice 2000 can represent a single computing device, multiple computingdevices, or a distributed computing system, for example. The computerdevice 2000 may be configured as a quantum computer (e.g., a QIPsystem), a classical computer, or a combination of quantum and classicalcomputing functions. For example, the computer device 2000 may be usedto process information using quantum algorithms based on trapped iontechnology and may therefore implement the dual-space, single speciesarchitecture described herein. A generic example of the computer device2000 as a QIP system is illustrated in the QIP system 1900 shown in FIG.19 .

In one example, the computer device 2000 may include a processor 2010for carrying out processing functions associated with one or more of thefeatures described herein. The processor 2010 may include a single ormultiple set of processors or multi-core processors. Moreover, theprocessor 2010 may be implemented as an integrated processing systemand/or a distributed processing system. The processor 2010 may include acentral processing unit (CPU), a quantum processing unit (QPU), agraphics processing unit (GPU), or combination of those types ofprocessors. In one aspect, the processor 2010 may refer to a generalprocessor of the computer device 2000, which may also include additionalprocessors 2010 to perform more specific functions such as functions forindividual beam control.

In an example, the computer device 2000 may include a memory 2020 forstoring instructions executable by the processor 2010 for carrying outthe functions described herein. In an implementation, for example, thememory 2020 may correspond to a computer-readable storage medium thatstores code or instructions to perform one or more of the functions oroperations described herein. Just like the processor 2010, the memory2020 may refer to a general memory of the computer device 2000, whichmay also include additional memories 2020 to store instructions and/ordata for more specific functions such as instructions and/or data forindividual beam control.

Further, the computer device 2000 may include a communications component2030 that provides for establishing and maintaining communications withone or more parties utilizing hardware, software, and services asdescribed herein. The communications component 2030 may carrycommunications between components on the computer device 2000, as wellas between the computer device 2000 and external devices, such asdevices located across a communications network and/or devices seriallyor locally connected to computer device 2000. For example, thecommunications component 2030 may include one or more buses, and mayfurther include transmit chain components and receive chain componentsassociated with a transmitter and receiver, respectively, operable forinterfacing with external devices.

Additionally, the computer device 2000 may include a data store 2040,which can be any suitable combination of hardware and/or software, whichprovides for mass storage of information, databases, and programsemployed in connection with implementations described herein. Forexample, the data store 2040 may be a data repository for operatingsystem 2060 (e.g., classical OS, or quantum OS). In one implementation,the data store 2040 may include the memory 2020.

The computer device 2000 may also include a user interface component2050 operable to receive inputs from a user of the computer device 2000and further operable to generate outputs for presentation to the user orto provide to a different system (directly or indirectly). The userinterface component 2050 may include one or more input devices,including but not limited to a keyboard, a number pad, a mouse, atouch-sensitive display, a digitizer, a navigation key, a function key,a microphone, a voice recognition component, any other mechanism capableof receiving an input from a user, or any combination thereof. Further,the user interface component 2050 may include one or more outputdevices, including but not limited to a display, a speaker, a hapticfeedback mechanism, a printer, any other mechanism capable of presentingan output to a user, or any combination thereof.

In an implementation, the user interface component 2050 may transmitand/or receive messages corresponding to the operation of the operatingsystem 2060. In addition, the processor 2010 may execute the operatingsystem 2060 and/or applications or programs, and the memory 2020 or thedata store 2040 may store them.

When the computer device 2000 is implemented as part of a cloud-basedinfrastructure solution, the user interface component 2050 may be usedto allow a user of the cloud-based infrastructure solution to remotelyinteract with the computer device 2000.

FIG. 21 illustrates an example of a scheme for cross-talk mitigation. Inquantum computers based on the optical manipulation of a chain oftrapped ions, one source of error may be caused by the optical crosstalkof the control beams. That is, when a control beam is intended toaddress one ion, the control beam may have non-negligible intensity atthe locations of the neighboring ions. This may unintentionally drivequbit transitions in the neighboring ions, which may lead tocomputational error. This error may be reduced by using composite pulsessequences to drive single-qubit gates, but such a remedy is may notpossible for two-qubit gates. The problem of crosstalk may worsen as thelength of the ion chain increases, because a longer ion chain mayrequire the spacing between neighboring ions to be reduced, leading tohigher levels of crosstalk. Crosstalk may be minimized through carefuloptical engineering of the control beam, but alternative methods ofmitigating the impact of optical crosstalk may be desirable.

In some aspects, one method of mitigating the impact of opticalcrosstalk is by selecting ions that will not serve as qubits for aparticular computation and making them insensitive to opticalmanipulation. Therefore, if there is some crosstalk onto these ions, thecrosstalk has no effect on the outcome of the computation. This can bedone, for example, by making those ions different isotopes or chemicalelements. However, for these methods, the number of non-qubit ionscannot be changed without reloading the entire chain, which is notfeasible to do dynamically between computations.

Aspects of the present disclosure include techniques that are based onDSSS trapped-ion control with a global HSS beam plus individuallyaddressable Raman beams. This method works by coherently transferringions in a single-species chain between different atomic manifolds.Specifically, aspects of the present disclosure include strategicallyselecting qubit ions and shelving some or all remaining ions into themetastable state. Consequently, the non-qubit ions may be insensitive tothe optical control beam, vastly reducing the impact of opticalcrosstalk.

Depending on the number of ions in the chain and/or the number of qubitsneeded for a particular calculation, aspects of the present disclosureinclude dynamically selecting the set of “buffer” ions to shelve. Whenfewer than half the ions in the chain are allocated as qubits, everyother ion may be shelved to improve nearest-neighbor crosstalksuppression. When most but not all of the ions are needed, aspects ofthe present disclosure include strategically selecting the buffer ionsdepending on the participation of different ions in certain motionalmodes, particulars of the optical crosstalk profile across the chain, orany other consideration.

The technique described above may be less sensitive to the quality ofthe shelving pulses. In the certain techniques, the qubit ions aretransferred from the ground state to the metastable state and backmultiple times throughout a sequence. Such techniques may require theerror rate and phase noise of the shelving pulses be low. In the currentscheme, however, there is no need to retrieve the non-qubit ions fromthe metastable state once the non-qubit ions are shelved there. Thus, itmay be possible to drive multiple shelving pulses to differentmetastable states. The error rate of the shelving operation is thereforethe product of the error rates of the individual shelving pulses, whichmay be made negligibly small with very loose requirements on the qualityof the individual shelving pulses.

Further, since the selective shelving operation requires onlysingle-qubit Raman manipulation, aspects of the present disclosure mayinclude using composite pulse sequences for the selective shelvingoperation, which are constructed to suppress sensitivity to crosstalk,to separate out the non-qubit ions. Therefore, thecrosstalk-suppressionscheme can itself be made to be relativelyinsensitive to crosstalk.

One aspect of the present disclosure includes selecting non-adjacenttrapped ions to participate in qubit operations. The neighboring trappedions of the non-adjacent trapped ions may be shuttled to the metastablemanifold to reduce the impacts of optical cross-talk.

Still referring to FIG. 21 , in some aspects, an example quantumcomputer implemented based on DSSS trapped ion control scheme mayinclude an ion chain 2100 having 10 trapped ions 2101, 2102, 2103, 2104,2105, 2106, 2107, 2108, 2109, 2110. A global HSS beam (not shown) may beapplied to the trapped ions 2101-1610, with individual Raman beamsapplied for transitioning among the manifolds. When a first Raman beam2150 is applied to the trapped ion 2102, a portion of the first Ramanbeam 2150 may “leak” into the neighboring trapped ions (trapped ions2101, 2103), which may lead to optical cross-talk and/or noise. The“leaks” may be caused by scattering, diffusion, reflection, refraction,and/or diffraction of the first Raman beam 2150, or the spatial extentof beam 2150, independent of any optical errors, may be such that it hasnon-negligible intensity at the location of ions 2101 and 2103. Such“leaks” may cause errors in the states of the neighboring trapped ions.According to an aspect of the present disclosure, prior to theaddressing of the trapped ion 2102, the neighboring trapped ions (i.e.,trapped ions 2101, 2103) may be shuttled from the ground state manifoldto the metastable manifold (e.g., using one or more m-type Raman beams).Consequently, during the addressing of the trapped ion 2102, any “leak”of the first Raman beam 2150 into the neighboring trapped ions may notnegatively impact the computation since the neighboring trapped ions arein the metastable manifold.

In another aspect, a qubit may be implemented by the trapped ions 2102,2106. As such, the trapped ion 2102 may be entangled with the trappedion 2106. Further, the trapped ion 2102 may be slightly entangled withthe trapped ions 2105 and 2107 (slightly entangled may mean lessentangled than the entanglement between trapped ions 2102, 2106). Thetrapped ion 2106 may be slightly entangled with the trapped ions 2101,2103. Therefore, if the neighboring trapped ions of the trapped ions2102, 2106 are shelved to the metastable manifold, less error will beintroduced into the computation during the addressing of the trappedions 2102, 2106.

In other aspects of the present disclosure, a measurement process may beimplemented to measure the severity of the cross-talk (to theneighboring trapped ions) caused by the Raman beam during the addressingof each trapped ion in an ion chain. If a qubit operation requires morethan half of the available trapped ions in the ion chain, aspects of thepresent disclosure may including selecting the trapped ions having Ramanbeams that cause the less optical cross-talk to the neighboring trappedions.

Still referring to FIG. 21 , in one aspect of the present disclosure, aqubit operation may require six of the ten qubits in the ion chain 2100.During the measurement process described above, it may be determinedthat the addressing of the trapped ions 2102, 2104, 2106, 2108, 2109,2110 by the corresponding Raman beams 2150, 2151, 2152, 2153, 2154, 2155cause less optical cross-talk to the neighboring ions than theaddressing of the trapped ions 2101, 2103, 2105, 2107. Consequently,aspects of the present disclosure may include selecting the trapped ions2102, 2104, 2106, 2108, 2109, 2110 for the qubit operation to reduceoverall noise/error during the qubit operation. The remaining trappedions not participating in the qubit operation (i.e., trapped ions 2101,2103, 2105, 2107) may be shelved to the metastable manifolds asdescribed above.

FIG. 22 illustrates an example of an illumination system 2200 configuredto illuminate and/or bias the ion chain 2100 according to aspects of thepresent disclosure. In some aspects, the illumination system 2200 mayinclude first light source 2202 configured to emit a global optical beam2204 toward the ion chain 2100. The illumination system 2200 may includea second slight source 2212 configured to emit individual Raman beamstoward the ion chain 2100. The illumination system 2200 may include amagnetic system 2222 configured to apply a magnetic field 2224 acrossthe ion chain 2100.

Turning to FIG. 23 , a method 2300 of reducing cross-talk in a QIPsystem may be performed by the illumination system 2200, subcomponentsof the illumination system 2200, the laser scheme of FIG. 18 , the QIPsystem 1900, subcomponents of the QIP system 1900, the computer device2000, and/or subcomponents of the computer device 2000.

At block 2305, the method 2300 may identify an ion chain having aplurality of trapped ions. For example, the QIP system 1900 and/or thecomputer device 2000 may identify an ion chain having a plurality oftrapped ions.

At block 2310, the method 2300 may select at least two non-consecutivetrapped ions in the ion chain for implementing a qubit. For example, theQIP system 1900, subcomponents of the QIP system 1900, the computerdevice 2000, and/or subcomponents of the computer device 2000 may selectthe trapped ions 2102, 2104 of the ion chain 2100 for implementing aqubit.

At block 2315, the method 2300 may apply at least a first Raman beam toshuttle at least one neighbor ION of the at least two non-consecutivetrapped ions from a ground state to a metastable state. For example, thefirst light source 2202 and/or the second light source 2212 may applythe individual Raman beams 2214 to the neighboring trapped ion 2103 totransition the neighboring trapped ion 2103 to the metastable state.

At block 2320, the method 2300 may apply at least a second Raman beam toone or more of the at least two non-consecutive trapped ions, aftershuttling the at least one neighbor ION to the metastable state, totransition from a first manifold to a second manifold. For example, thesecond light source 2212 may apply the individual Raman beams 2214 tothe trapped ions 2102, 2104.

Aspects of the present disclosure may include a method and/or a systemfor identifying an ion chain having a plurality of trapped ions,selecting at least two non-consecutive trapped ions in the ion chain forimplementing a qubit, applying at least a first Raman beam to shuttle atleast one neighbor ion of the at least two non-consecutive trapped ionsfrom a ground state to a metastable state, and applying at least asecond Raman beam to one or more of the at least two non-consecutivetrapped ions, after shuttling the at least one neighbor ion to themetastable state, to transition from a first manifold to a secondmanifold.

Aspects of the present disclosure include the method and/or systemabove, further comprising, prior to applying the at least first Ramanbeam and the at least second Raman beam applying each of a plurality ofRaman beams to each corresponding trapped ion of the plurality oftrapped ions, and measuring optical cross-talk associated withneighboring trapped ions in response to applying each of the pluralityof Raman beams to each of the corresponding trapped ion.

Aspects of the present disclosure include any of the method and/orsystem above, further comprising selecting a first portion of theplurality of trapped ions, wherein first optical cross-talk of the firstportion of the plurality of trapped ions is lower than second opticalcross-talk of a second portion of the plurality of trapped ions.

Aspects of the present disclosure include any of the method and/orsystem above, wherein the first portion of the plurality of trapped ionsincludes the at least two non-consecutive trapped ions.

Aspects of the present disclosure include any of the method and/orsystem above, wherein applying the at least a first Raman beam comprisesapplying a composite pulse sequence.

Aspects of the present disclosure include any of the method and/orsystem above, wherein the plurality of trapped ions includes a pluralityof dual-space, single-species (DSSS) trapped-ions.

Aspects of the present disclosure include a method and/or a system forapplying a global optical beam to a plurality of dual-space,single-species (DSSS) trapped ions, and applying at least one Raman beamof a plurality of Raman beams to a DSSS trapped ion of the plurality ofDSSS trapped ions to transition a qubit associated with the DSSS trappedion from a ground state, a metastable state, or an optical state to adifferent state.

Aspects of the present disclosure include any of the method and/orsystem above, wherein applying the global optical beam comprisesapplying a coherent quantum pulse sequence.

Aspects of the present disclosure include any of the method and/orsystem above, wherein applying the global optical beam comprisesapplying a single laser beam having an eccentricity in a direction alongthe plurality of DSSS trapped ions such that the single laser beamcovers the plurality of DSSS trapped ions.

Aspects of the present disclosure include any of the method and/orsystem above, wherein applying the global optical beam comprisesapplying the global optical beam at a first 45-degree angle with respectto the plurality of DSSS trapped ions and a second 45-degree angle withrespect to a magnetic field.

Aspects of the present disclosure include any of the method and/orsystem above, further comprising adjusting a frequency of the at leastone Raman beam of the plurality of Raman beams using an electro-opticmodulator (EOM) or an acousto-optic modulator (AOM) disposed in serieswith an EOM.

Aspects of the present disclosure include any of the method and/orsystem above, further comprising applying a cooling Raman beam of theplurality of Raman beams to at least a cooling ion of the plurality ofDSSS trapped ions to transition the cooling ion from a first state to asecond state that is higher than the first state.

Aspects of the present disclosure include any of the method and/orsystem above, further comprising reading an ancilla ion of the pluralityof DSSS trapped ions associated with the DSSS trapped ion during acomputation of the qubit.

Aspects of the present disclosure include any of the method and/orsystem above, further comprising calibrating the DSSS trapped ion basedon the reading of the ancilla ion during the computation of the qubit.

Aspects of the present disclosure include any of the method and/orsystem above, further comprising performing remote entanglementgeneration between the plurality of DSSS trapped ions and one or moreremote DSSS trapped ions.

The previous description of the disclosure is provided to enable aperson skilled in the art to make or use the disclosure. Variousmodifications to the disclosure will be readily apparent to thoseskilled in the art, and the common principles defined herein may beapplied to other variations without departing from the spirit or scopeof the disclosure. Furthermore, although elements of the describedaspects may be described or claimed in the singular, the plural iscontemplated unless limitation to the singular is explicitly stated.Additionally, all or a portion of any aspect may be utilized with all ora portion of any other aspect, unless stated otherwise. Thus, thedisclosure is not to be limited to the examples and designs describedherein but is to be accorded the widest scope consistent with theprinciples and novel features disclosed herein.

What is claimed is:
 1. A method for performing an echo sequence in aquantum information processing (QIP) system, comprising: applying afirst global optical beam to a plurality of dual space single species(DSSS) trapped ions to transition the plurality of DSSS trapped ionsfrom a first state in a first manifold to a first state in a secondmanifold; and applying, at a time after applying the first globaloptical beam, a second global optical beam to the plurality of DSSStrapped ions to transition: from the first state in the second manifoldto the first state in the first manifold; and from a second state in thefirst manifold to a second state in the second manifold.
 2. The methodof claim 1, further comprising: applying a Raman beam to transition atleast a readout qubit of the plurality of DSSS trapped ions from a firststate of the first manifold to a second state of the first manifold;applying a third global optical beam to transition a remainder of theplurality of DSSS trapped ions from the first state in the firstmanifold to the first state in the second manifold; applying a globaldetection laser to the at least one readout qubit to obtain informationassociated with the at least one readout qubit; and pumping the at leastone readout qubit from the second state in the first manifold to thefirst state in the first manifold.
 3. The method of claim 2, furthercomprising: applying a fourth global optical beam to transition theplurality of DSSS trapped ions from the second state in the secondmanifold to the second state in the first manifold; applying a secondRaman beam to each of the at least one readout qubit based on theinformation obtained; applying a fifth global optical beam to toggle theplurality of DSSS trapped ions between the corresponding states in thefirst manifold and the second manifold; and applying a sixth globaloptical beam to transition the plurality of DSSS trapped ions from thesecond state in the second manifold to the second state in the firstmanifold.
 4. The method of claim 2, further comprising: applying afourth global optical beam to toggle the plurality of DSSS trapped ionsbetween the corresponding states in the first manifold and the secondmanifold; applying a fifth global optical beam to transition theplurality of DSSS trapped ions from the second state in the firstmanifold to the second state in the second manifold; applying a sixthglobal optical beam to toggle the plurality of DSSS trapped ions betweenthe corresponding states in the first manifold and the second manifold;and applying a second Raman beam to each of the at least one readoutqubit based on the information obtained; and applying a seventh globaloptical beam to transition the plurality of DSSS trapped ions from thesecond state in the first manifold to the second state in the secondmanifold.
 5. The method of claim 1, wherein the first manifold is aground manifold and the second manifold is a metastable manifold.
 6. Themethod of claim 1, wherein the plurality of DSSS trapped ions includesat least a data qubit and at least a readout qubit.
 7. The method ofclaim 1, wherein applying the second global optical beam furthercomprises applying the second global optical beam to cancel out noisesgenerated during the applying of the first global optical beam.
 8. Anon-transitory computer readable medium having instructions storedtherein that, when executed by one or more processors of a quantuminformation processing (QIP) system, cause the one or more processorsto: apply a first global optical beam to a plurality of dual spacesingle species (DSSS) trapped ions to transition the plurality of DSSStrapped ions from a first state in a first manifold to a first state ina second manifold; and apply, at a time after applying the first globaloptical beam, a second global optical beam to the plurality of DSSStrapped ions to transition: from the first state in the second manifoldto the first state in the first manifold; and from a second state in thefirst manifold to a second state in the second manifold.
 9. Thenon-transitory computer readable medium of claim 8, further comprisinginstructions for: applying a Raman beam to transition at least a readoutqubit of the plurality of DSSS trapped ions from a first state of thefirst manifold to a second state of the first manifold; applying a thirdglobal optical beam to transition a remainder of the plurality of DSSStrapped ions from the first state in the first manifold to the firststate in the second manifold; applying a global detection laser to theat least one readout qubit to obtain information associated with the atleast one readout qubit; and pumping the at least one readout qubit fromthe second state in the first manifold to the first state in the firstmanifold.
 10. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 9,further comprising instructions for: applying a fourth global opticalbeam to transition the plurality of DSSS trapped ions from the secondstate in the second manifold to the second state in the first manifold;applying a second Raman beam to each of the at least one readout qubitbased on the information obtained; applying a fifth global optical beamto toggle the plurality of DSSS trapped ions between the correspondingstates in the first manifold and the second manifold; and applying asixth global optical beam to transition the plurality of DSSS trappedions from the second state in the second manifold to the second state inthe first manifold.
 11. The non-transitory computer readable medium ofclaim 9, further comprising instructions for: applying a fourth globaloptical beam to toggle the plurality of DSSS trapped ions between thecorresponding states in the first manifold and the second manifold;applying a fifth global optical beam to transition the plurality of DSSStrapped ions from the second state in the first manifold to the secondstate in the second manifold; applying a sixth global optical beam totoggle the plurality of DSSS trapped ions between the correspondingstates in the first manifold and the second manifold; applying a secondRaman beam to each of the at least one readout qubit based on theinformation obtained; and applying a seventh global optical beam totransition the plurality of DSSS trapped ions from the second state inthe first manifold to the second state in the second manifold.
 12. Thenon-transitory computer readable medium of claim 9, wherein the firstmanifold is a ground manifold and the second manifold is a metastablemanifold.
 13. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 9,wherein the plurality of DSSS trapped ions includes at least a dataqubit and at least a readout qubit.
 14. The non-transitory computerreadable medium of claim 9, wherein the instructions for applying thesecond global optical beam further comprises instructions for applyingthe second global optical beam to cancel out noises generated during theapplying of the first global optical beam.
 15. A quantum informationprocessing (QIP) system, comprising: a first light source configured toapply: a first global optical beam to a plurality of dual space singlespecies (DSSS) trapped ions to transition the plurality of DSSS trappedions from a first state in a first manifold to a first state in a secondmanifold; and at a time after applying the first global optical beam, asecond global optical beam to the plurality of DSSS trapped ions totransition: from the first state in the second manifold to the firststate in the first manifold; and from a second state in the firstmanifold to a second state in the second manifold.; and a controllerconfigured to control at least the first light source.
 16. The QIPsystem of claim 15, further comprising: a second light source configuredto apply a Raman beam to transition at least a readout qubit of theplurality of DSSS trapped ions from a first state of the first manifoldto a second state of the first manifold; a third light source configuredto apply a global detection laser to the at least one readout qubit toobtain information associated with the at least one readout qubit; afourth light source configured to pump the at least one readout qubitfrom the second state in the first manifold to the first state in thefirst manifold; and wherein the first light source is further configuredto apply a third global optical beam to transition a remainder of theplurality of DSSS trapped ions from the first state in the firstmanifold to the first state in the second manifold.
 17. The QIP systemof claim 16, wherein: the first light source is further configured toapply: a fourth global optical beam to transition the plurality of DSSStrapped ions from the second state in the second manifold to the secondstate in the first manifold; a fifth global optical beam to toggle theplurality of DSSS trapped ions between the corresponding states in thefirst manifold and the second manifold; and a sixth global optical beamto transition the plurality of DSSS trapped ions from the second statein the second manifold to the second state in the first manifold; andthe second light source is further configured to apply a second Ramanbeam to each of the at least one readout qubit based on the informationobtained.
 18. The QIP system of claim 16, wherein: the first lightsource is further configured to apply: a fourth global optical beam totoggle the plurality of DSSS trapped ions between the correspondingstates in the first manifold and the second manifold; a fifth globaloptical beam to transition the plurality of DSSS trapped ions from thesecond state in the first manifold to the second state in the secondmanifold; a sixth global optical beam to toggle the plurality of DSSStrapped ions between the corresponding states in the first manifold andthe second manifold; and a seventh global optical beam to transition theplurality of DSSS trapped ions from the second state in the firstmanifold to the second state in the second manifold; and the secondslight source is further configured to apply a second Raman beam to eachof the at least one readout qubit based on the information obtained. 19.The QIP system of claim 15, wherein the first manifold is a groundmanifold and the second manifold is a metastable manifold.
 20. The QIPsystem of claim 15, wherein the plurality of DSSS trapped ions includesat least a data qubit and at least a readout qubit.
 21. The QIP systemof claim 15, wherein applying the second global optical beam furthercomprises applying the second global optical beam to cancel out noisesgenerated during the applying of the first global optical beam.